X hashtag analyse

t #dkmedier sidste 24 timer

t #dkmedier seneste måned

t Mest aktive brugere

• 1
  

  CuiqueRuneOrder (@CuiqueRuneOrder)

  17 tweets

• 2
  

  polnyt.dk - borgerlig borgerjournalistik og satire (@polnytdk)

  9 tweets

• 3
  

  Michael K. Petersen 🇩🇰 🇬🇱 (@M_K_Petersen)

  8 tweets

• 4
  

  Julle (@Jullemand007)

  7 tweets

• 5
  

  Kristian (@KayAgeOfEl)

  6 tweets

t Seneste tweets

• 

  07:24

  Palle Poulsen (@PallePoulsen)

  Hvorfor skal danskerne finansiere udenlandske statsborgere? Det er jo indlysende forkert. #dkpol #dkmedier https://t.co/GVYpmoQI94

• 

  07:14

  Henning Boye Hansen (@hbh_boye)

  Det spirende oprør mod ejendomsvurderingerne skyldes sjovt nok ikke et ønske om at slippe billigere i skat, men at ejerne bare gerne vil kunne gennemskue beskatningsgrundlaget for deres ejendom. Ikke noget urimeligt krav. #dkmedier #dkpol https://t.co/J515HnwtzW

• 

  02:42

  Sup Aya Laya (@SupAyaLaya)

  Hvad tjente SSI på covid-affæren? #dkmedier QT @HighWireTalk (The HighWire) 🚨The scientist who told the world COVID wasn't made in a lab forgot to mention his own lab was cashing checks from the vaccine. We're still working through the hundreds of pages @SenRandPaul's committee released of the private Slack messages between the scientists behind "The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2"... the paper that told the world in March 2020 the virus was NOT made in a lab. More on that soon. But we wanted to flag this one now. March 22, 2021 (a year after the paper published) lead author Kristian Andersen writes to his three co-authors: "Wait until the tinfoil hats get a hold of this information. I learned today that Scripps Research has a 1/3% royalty stream to the COVID-19 vaccines because we hold the patent on the '2P' mutation used to stabilize the spike protein - used in all the leading vaccines… $40m so far this year." Scripps Research - Andersen's own employer, the institution where "Proximal Origin" was written - held a patent used in the leading COVID vaccines, and was collecting royalty income from it. By Andersen's own count, $40 million in 2021 alone. That royalty relationship does not appear in the paper's conflict-of-interest disclosure. Andersen flags the "tinfoil hats" optics himself, in the message, in real time. We're just showing you what he wrote. More findings coming as we work through the rest of the documents. For source docs: https://t.co/zmS597JPWf

• 

  02:18

  Marie Kieler 💚🤍💜 (@MarieKieler)

  #dkpol #dkmedier (tøffelheltene) @Spolitik @SFpolitik @DanskDf1995 @venstredk @KonservativeDK @LiberalAlliance #wakeupguarantors QT @Rob_ThaBuilder (The Heretical Liberal 🇨🇦) Its a great question and one with a relatively straightforward answer: Why IS the large amount of energy spent brute forcing weird language changes entirely directed toward changing the language used to describe women - "pregnant people", "uterus havers", "menstrators", "ppl with vaginas" - but absolutely none designed to change language used for men? Where is the energy devoted to changing "men" into ejaculators, penis people, or testicle havers? The reason is simple: its a movement entirely devoted to advancing tbe interests of fetishistic men, period. Nobody in this movement - including the trans themselves - gives the slightest shit about the trans identified females. They are the movements Useful Idiots, their existence is entirely devoted to one role: to validate the mens claims that they are "real women" by making it appear to be a universal phenomenon instead of a male-specific fetish. This is why the women are more or less required to take the testosterone, to gave their breasts removed and (sometimes) to get the fake flesh roll penis in order to be considered a "real man" in the trans community, but a man is not required to take drugs or surgeries to be validated, he is a woman at the very second he declares he is. The women need to pay the cost in blood and flesh in order to be validated, the men simply need to recite the magic words. In pop culture terms, this is why Ellen Page needed to cut her breasts off and take deformity-inducing levels of tesosterone to "be a man", but Bruce Jenner gets to keep his cock, throw on a dress, and @VanityFair declares him Woman Of The Year. The hilarious irony of all the libfems supporting this nonsense is how they see "The Patriarchy" is so many situations in life where it doesnt really exist, and yet when the purest, most male-centred version of Patriarchial control appears, they support it with the vigor and intensity that their suffragette foremothers fought for the right to vote

• 

  01:53

  CuiqueRuneOrder (@CuiqueRuneOrder)

  @HolstVigilius @mandivalby Du har heller aldrig snakket om den massive vold som danskerne udsættes for men derimod bare sådan noget kulturetligt og åndeligt bullshit! #dkpol #dkmedier https://t.co/3Gwiy5qb4h