X hashtag analyse

t #dkpol sidste 24 timer

t #dkpol seneste måned

t Mest aktive brugere

• 1
  

  CuiqueRuneOrder (@CuiqueRuneOrder)

  39 tweets

• 2
  

  Jesper Pedersen (@mandivalby)

  13 tweets

• 3
  

  Helle Kramp (@hellekramp)

  13 tweets

• 4
  

  Greven af storebælt. 🇩🇰 (@grevenudafluft)

  12 tweets

• 5
  

  Peter Rasmussen (@PeterRa58783464)

  12 tweets

t Seneste tweets

• 

  23:36

  Marie Kieler 💚🤍💜 (@MarieKieler)

  #dkpol @Spolitik @regeringDK @SFpolitik @IdaAuken @NWammen @venstredk @DanskDf1995 @KonservativeDK Har I hørt om den nye trend blandt teens? Nu identificerer de sig som “otherkind” fra en fremmed verden. Det skal nok gribe om sig. Hvordan vil I “behandle” dem? Lad børn være. QT @EdelGeertje (Geert-Jan Edelenbosch) A real breakthrough in the Dutch debate! Just days before the Dutch Health Council is expected to advise on youth gender medicine, an unusually broad and credible coalition has challenged the Dutch Protocol in a mainstream national newspaper. The group includes Pieter Omtzigt, one of the Netherlands’ most prominent former MPs and institutional watchdogs, Dorine Sellenraad, a clinical psychologist formerly affiliated with a gender clinic, emeritus professor Armand Girbes, former politicians, clinicians, writers and people with lived experience. The concern is urgent: the advice may lock the future of Dutch care into the very treatment model now being reassessed internationally. The country that created and exported this model can no longer look away. Article in Dutch here, below an English translation https://t.co/TMlGKrly5m Opinion: dissatisfaction with your gender can come and go On 30 June, the Health Council of the Netherlands will issue its advice on what is officially called “transgender healthcare for young people”. Thirty years after the Netherlands, through the Dutch Protocol, set the international direction for this field of care, the evidence base is under pressure: systematic reviews find insufficient reliable evidence that the expected benefits of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in minors outweigh the uncertainties and risks, while the consequences are far-reaching and often irreversible. Other European countries have therefore become more cautious; the Dutch House of Representatives requested a new assessment. But the question of evidence cannot be separated from a prior question: what exactly are we treating? In its description of the advisory process, the Health Council already refers to “transgender children and young people”. This is common terminology, but it does contain an assumption. Is a young person with gender dysphoria someone with a fixed, inner gender identity that needs to be affirmed? Or are we dealing with distress around the body, sexual orientation and social expectations, whose origin, meaning and development are still open? That choice determines how research is interpreted, how diagnoses are made and what care a young person receives. Should broad diagnostics and psychological support come first? Or is the process relatively quickly directed towards a medical pathway, with far-reaching and often irreversible consequences for fertility, sexual experience, bone density and lifelong dependence on hormones? This is precisely why the conceptual framework matters. “Gender identity” is not an established medical fact, yet it is increasingly used as the starting point in guidelines, training, media and policy. As a result, psychological exploration, broad diagnostics or watchful waiting can quickly sound like delaying care or denying the child, while they may in fact be careful and responsible forms of help. Recognising the distress of young people is not the same as making one explanation and one treatment self-evident. It is precisely during puberty that many young people gain greater clarity about their body, sexuality and sexual orientation. A longitudinal study from the Groningen TRAILS cohort shows why caution is warranted: feelings of dissatisfaction with one’s sex were relatively common in early adolescence, but later decreased in a substantial proportion of young people. Such findings underline that distress about one’s sex can change during development and that it is therefore risky to interpret this distress too quickly as a fixed gender identity. The Dutch Protocol was developed thirty years ago for a small, carefully selected group of young people with early-onset, persistent gender dysphoria and relatively few co-occurring problems. The patient population has since changed dramatically. Many more young people now present at gender clinics, with a striking increase in girls whose gender dysphoria emerges around or after puberty and often coincides with mental health or neurodevelopmental difficulties. It is scientifically irresponsible to apply conclusions from the original group to this broader and more complex population, especially since even for the original group there is still no robust evidence that the medical pathway produces sustained improvements in mental health. A recent scientific analysis of thirty years of Dutch Protocol research concludes that the effectiveness of the protocol has not been reliably demonstrated. The groups studied were small, outcome measures varied and criteria for success shifted over time. At the same time, the first medical step is less tentative than is often suggested: almost all young people who start puberty blockers go on to cross-sex hormones. The so-called “pause button” is therefore usually the beginning of a far-reaching medical pathway with irreversible consequences. Other countries have now drawn firmer conclusions. In the United Kingdom, Sweden, Finland and Norway, systematic reviews and assessments by health authorities have led to a clear change of course: medical interventions in minors were restricted, and broad diagnostics and psychological support were placed at the centre of care. In the United States too, the evidence for these interventions is being assessed increasingly critically; a growing number of states have now introduced strict restrictions or bans. The Netherlands cannot continue to ignore this international correction. The Health Council must therefore go beyond assessing whether the evidence for puberty blockers and hormones is strong enough. It must also make visible which assumptions underlie the Dutch Protocol. Gender dysphoria in young people can have multiple explanations. It is therefore not sufficient to examine only medical outcomes. The questions must also be asked: which alternative pathways have been considered? Which young people develop differently without medicalisation? And who truly benefits from a far-reaching medical pathway? The Netherlands has a special responsibility in this matter. It developed and legitimised a pathway towards far-reaching, partly irreversible medical treatments for minors. Those who offer such a treatment model to the world must also provide the evidence that model requires. If, after thirty years, that evidence still falls short, the uncertainty must not be placed on the child. Signatories, in alphabetical order: Ruben Buijs, physician, clinical pathologist Geert-Jan Edelenbosch, publicist and former project leader for youth and education at COC Nederland Armand Girbes, internist-intensivist, clinical pharmacologist, former head of intensive care at VUmc and emeritus professor of intensive care medicine Marieke Hoogwout, writer, editor at Vrij Links Hacsi Horváth, clinical epidemiologist, expert in systematic reviews and detransitioner Maureen Horváth, medical biologist Daniëlle Jansen, medical sociologist, former Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport Hanneke Kouwenberg, physician, radiologist Pieter Omtzigt, econometrician, former Member of the Dutch House of Representatives Marieke den Ouden, psychologist, biologist Roelien den Ouden, healthcare psychologist, educational psychologist Nicki Pouw-Verweij, physician, former State Secretary for Long-Term and Social Care Dorine Sellenraad, clinical psychologist, psychotherapist, former staff member at the VUmc gender clinic

• 

  23:31

  polnyt.dk - borgerlig borgerjournalistik og satire (@polnytdk)

  Så ved man, at man har ramt plet :) -- Islam: Et stort Ashura-optog, fyldt med radikaliserede tilhængere af islam, bevæger sig i dag gennem den bagende varme på Rådhuspladsen i København. Den mørke middelalder er importeret til Danmark, har været her alt for længe. #dkpol #satire #islam #Ashura https://t.co/xgKlo6TBFk

• 

  23:27

  Julle (@Jullemand007)

  Tænk hvis alle de kvinder havde deres egen fri vilje og ikke var underlagt deres mænds dominans. Hvor mange kvinder tror i så ville gå med i det optog på den måde hvor de bliver sendt bagved fordi de anses for at være mindre værd end mænd ? #dkpol #dkmedier https://t.co/yzKeySc8UN

• 

  23:23

  Anders Kolling (@AndersKolling)

  RT @LindaGreenty (Linda Greenty): Uønskede muslimske velfærdsmigranter, kommet hertil på EU Muhammed kvoten, tramper rundt i vores gade, mens danskerne er på arbejde. Send dem hjem. #dkpol https://t.co/aROCDRI7l6

• 

  23:18

  Julle (@Jullemand007)

  Fra 2020 og nu i 2026 🤷‍♂️🤷‍♂️og hvad er der sket? Hvem er det dog vi skal beskyttes imod gang på gang, år efter år bare for at kunne tage et tog uden frygt for overfald. Indvandrergrupper….igen og igen og igen De sidste mange regeringer nogle krystere. #dkpol #dkmedier https://t.co/ChlbeBMEJj