Bent Preben Nielsen (@bentpn)
Kristian (@KayAgeOfEl)
Michael K. Petersen 🇩🇰 🇬🇱 (@M_K_Petersen)
CuiqueRuneOrder (@CuiqueRuneOrder)
Statsstyret (@Statsstyret)
Kristian (@KayAgeOfEl)
Mærkeligt - og bekymrende - at vi ALDRIG ser undersøgelser vedrørende opbakningen til Israel herhjemme - altså udover den vi kan se blandt Folketingets medlemmer, når de nedstemmer borgerforslag om stop for våbeneksport til selvsamme terrorstat #dkpol #dkmedier QT @owenjonesjourno (Owen Jones) In 2022, Israel's net favourability among American men under 50 was minus 3. It's now minus 47. Support for Israel is becoming a fringe opinion in the West. https://t.co/9fRKsGgCoV
L_C_I (@LCI_consult)
#dkpol #dkbiz Der er ingen grænser for Zelensky vrøvl. Pga geografi var en stor del af USSRs atomvåben placeret i Ukraine men tilhørte USSR. Og det var USSR som opgav atom arsenalet som naturlig konsekvens af sin egen opløsning og ikke Ukraine. QT @World_At_War_6 (WORLD AT WAR) 🇺🇦💥Zelensky: Giving Up Nuclear Weapons Was a Strategic Mistake. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reaffirmed his position that Ukraine’s 1994 decision to surrender its nuclear arsenal was a major historical mistake and a form of "foul play". In discussions in early 2026, he argued that the disarmament occurred without securing legally binding or enforceable security guarantees, claiming the Budapest Memorandum where Ukraine traded the world's third-largest nuclear arsenal for security assurances has been completely ineffective. Zelenskyy asserts that NATO membership is the only acceptable alternative to nuclear deterrence for Ukraine’s survival. What do you think? Do you believe Ukraine made a mistake by giving up its nuclear weapons? Video for illustration:
Brian Esbensen 🇵🇸 🇺🇦 🇿🇦 (@BEsbensen)
Det burde skabe kæmpe overskrifter, at en @amnesty-chef taler sådan her om EU/Kallas. Alle klappede i hænderne forleden over Orbans fald (det var så dejlig nemt - ham hader vi alle), men kampen for menneskerettigheder er langt fra slut. https://t.co/NRt7Qv1Ydu #dkpol QT @AgnesCallamard (Agnes Callamard) So today, at the Security Council, High Representative Kaja Kallas has lamented the gravest violation and breakdown of international law since the Second World War, evident, I quote "in today’s two pre-eminent global crises — Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine and the war in the Middle East." Quick quantitative analysis of her speech: Mention of Russia: 11 Mention of Israel: 0 Mention of the USA: 0 Mention of Iran: 1 Her unwillingness, her deliberate failure, to mention the two actors (in addition to Russia) responsible for the greatest violations of international law, is not just coward. It is criminal. It explains the repeated violations of international law, the breakdown of the UN Charter, the global regime of impunity. The failure is counted in acts of aggressions, in a genocide, in deliberate or disproportionate or indiscriminate attacks against civilians, in thousands of civilians deaths, including children, in unlawful occupation and de facto annexation. The double standards inherent in Ms. Kallas speech are destroying international law. https://t.co/r5fV7rnP2U
Kristian (@KayAgeOfEl)
Mærkeligt og bekymrende, at vi ALDRIG ser undersøgelser om opbakningen til Israel herhjemme - altså udover den vi ser blandt Folketingets medlemmer, når de nedstemmer borgerforslag om stop for våbeneksport til selvsamme terrorstat #dkpol #dkmedier QT @owenjonesjourno (Owen Jones) In 2022, Israel's net favourability among American men under 50 was minus 3. It's now minus 47. Support for Israel is becoming a fringe opinion in the West. https://t.co/9fRKsGgCoV
Statsstyret (@Statsstyret)
Kristoffer Bayer, som DR brugte til at kalde @Rasmus_MunchS for en slem, slem racist, er faktisk ret vild med Marx 😂🤡 Hvem havde ikke set den komme... 🤣🤣🤣 #dkpol #dkmedier #klovnemedie https://t.co/lozUtUTQ3L QT @dcorell (Dennis Corell) Hvorfor er DRs eksperter altid skøre marxister? Her Kristoffer Bayer skrevet en tese om at at nationer er en såkaldt "imaginær opfindelse". Som ny-marxismen skal forholde sig til imodsætning til den klassiske marxisme, som tog udgangspunkt i nationalstaterne. https://t.co/puk38h25DK
