X hashtag analyse

t #dkpol sidste 24 timer

t #dkpol seneste måned

t Mest aktive brugere

• 1
  

  Bent Preben Nielsen (@bentpn)

  12 tweets

• 2
  

  Peter Rasmussen (@PeterRa58783464)

  8 tweets

• 3
  

  Palle Poulsen (@PallePoulsen)

  7 tweets

• 4
  

  KtMasters (@KTM11123)

  6 tweets

• 5
  

  Netavisen Pio (@Netavisen_Pio)

  5 tweets

t Seneste tweets

• 

  00:39

  Torben L-Larsen🌨️ (@TorbenLl1)

  RT @cyrus_razavi (Cyrus Razavi): Samme regler? Nej. Det er den ældste finte: at udviske forskelle, så alt ligner det samme. Veganeren fravælger. Allergikeren reagerer biologisk. Kosher gælder i egne miljøer. Fællesnævneren? Ingen af dem kræver, at andre indretter sig. Ja, der findes aktivister i alle lejre. Forskellen er, hvem der lykkes institutionelt og hvorfor. Når fælles regler ændres, så alle skal indrette sig efter én religiøs norm, er det ikke længere et personligt hensyn. Det er et kollektivt indgreb. Og det er dér din analogi kollapser. Du kalder det “samme regler”. Men du sammenligner fravalg med pålæg. Biologi med teologi. Individuelle hensyn med strukturelle ændringer. Det er ikke det samme. Aldrig. Og så stråmanden: “At folk bliver sure over, at en muslim får et alternativ.” Nej. Folk reagerer, når valget fjernes fra alle andre. Når fælles normer ændres ensidigt. Når institutioner begynder at bøje sig for krav, der rækker ud over individet. Når det ikke handler om at give plads, men om at ændre rummet. Og det vigtigste, du udelader: Der findes ikke veganere, allergikere eller kosher-regler, der i bred skala ændrer det offentlige rum. Det gør det her. Skoler. Daginstitutioner. Arbejdspladser. Offentlige rum. Det er ikke enkeltstående episoder. Det er et mønster. Så nej, det handler ikke om, hvem reglerne er lavet for. Det handler om, hvad de gør ved fællesskabet. Du kalder det “sund fornuft”. Men sund fornuft skelner mellem hensyn og eftergivenhed. Uden den skelnen forsvinder grænserne. Og når grænser forsvinder, kommer reaktionen. Det er ikke hykleri. Det er en befolkning, der kan se mønstret. #dkpol #dkmedier @DanskDf1995

• 

  23:50

  Ole Futtrup (@HejlsNor)

  RT @Anders8455 (Anders Jensen): Spørg jer selv, hvorfor vi ikke hører om dette i #dkmedier eller fra #dkpol. Var dette sket i Israel, havde medier og politikere haft meget at sige, fordømme osv..

• 

  23:44

  Sup Aya Laya (@SupAyaLaya)

  @justitiaorg #dkpol QT @IntCyberDigest (International Cyber Digest) 🚨🇪🇺 The European Commission is about to steal your search history in one of the largest forced data grabs in the history of the open internet, and almost nobody is talking about it. The scope is staggering: 🔴 Every query you type 🔴 Every voice and photo search 🔴 Every autocomplete you accept 🔴 Your language, your device 🔴 Your country pinned to a ~3km² grid 🔴 Every result you saw, every link you hovered 🔴 Every click and scroll 🔴 The full chronological order of your search sessions Meaning the European Union now knows your: 🔴 Health symptoms 🔴 Pregnancy 🔴 Sexual orientation 🔴 Political views 🔴 Religious beliefs 🔴 Financial distress 🔴 Legal trouble 🔴 Addictions 🔴 Affairs Under the proposed measures for DMA Article 6(11), Google would be ordered to ship the daily search behaviour of hundreds of millions of Europeans to multiple third parties through a daily API feed. Any approved "online search engine," AI chatbots included, would get five years of access. The things people only ever type when they think no one is watching. All of it now scheduled to flow daily into an open-ended list of third parties scattered across the European Union. Brussels promises "anonymisation." The reality is a thin technical veneer that has been broken in academic literature again and again for over a decade. Search behaviour is a fingerprint. Stripping a name does not change that. Mass data leaks become inevitable. Every new beneficiary is a new attack surface, and every annual audit is a year of silent exposure between checks. The 2025 Discord vendor breach already showed how fast 70,000 government IDs can leak through a single weak link. Now imagine that link holding Europe's search history. Surveillance without consent becomes the default. Hundreds of millions of EU citizens never agreed to have their queries packaged and shipped to companies they have never heard of. The legal fiction of "anonymisation" cannot manufacture consent that was never given. Behavioural search data is a goldmine for phishing, blackmail, social engineering, and corporate espionage. Foreign intelligence services get a back door without effort. They do not need to breach Google. They only need to compromise the weakest name on the beneficiary list. One insolvent startup. One compromised contractor. One approved entity quietly acquired by a hostile state. In the name of "competition," the EU is about to manufacture a permanent, distributed, daily-refreshed copy of Europe's collective search history. A surveillance dataset Brussels itself would never approve if any other government tried to build it. The public consultation closes Friday, May 1, 2026 at 23:59 CEST. The final binding decision lands July 27, 2026. After that, the door does not close again. Tag your MEPs! File a response! Make noise!

• 

  23:18

  KtMasters (@KTM11123)

  RT @HansJoachimM_ (HansJoachim): ***Somalier sendte døtre på genopdragelsesrejse og udsatte dem for gentagen vold: Slap for udvisning*** #dkpol #dkkrim https://t.co/jNEnkbVTw0

• 

  22:54

  The Human Tree (Poetry collection) - MEMO 🎒 (@HumanTree_poems)

  RT @Anders8455 (Anders Jensen): Israel vil blive husket for at have begået nogle af de mest barbariske forbrydelser bl.a. folkemord. Og USA har faciliteret det, mens især vestlige lande har støttet det - politisk, materielt og/el retorisk. Og vestlige medier har banet vejen for forbrydelserne. #dkmedier #dkpol